<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PSE to answer questions about Energize Eastside</title>
	<atom:link href="/2014/04/11/pse-to-answer-questions-about-energize-eastside/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://newcastle-news.com/2014/04/11/pse-to-answer-questions-about-energize-eastside</link>
	<description>Newcastle News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 19:31:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Roosme</title>
		<link>https://newcastle-news.com/2014/04/11/pse-to-answer-questions-about-energize-eastside/comment-page-1#comment-91137</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A. Roosme]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2014 00:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://newcastle-news.com/?p=11933#comment-91137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PSE’s proposal to replace the current 115kV overhead power line with 230kV lines on taller poles does not consider the negative impact on our community. Overhead power lines do not belong in residential areas for the following reasons:
•	Exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) has been linked to increased rates
        of certain cancers, such as leukemia in children and cancers of the lymph 
        and diseases of central nervous systems in adults 
•	Inhaling charged particles/pollutants around power lines has been linked to 
        an increase in free radicals and many adverse health effects, such as cancer 
•	Interference with implanted pacemakers and defibrillators
•	Power line noise
•	Aesthetics
•	Impact on views
•	All of the above contribute to significantly reduced residential property values

Overhead power line supporters say that studies of EMF on health have been inconclusive. Studies of tobacco smoke were also inconclusive for decades before undeniable links to cancers and other serious health conditions were identified.  The EPA and the EU have developed recommendations and regulations for limiting exposure to EMF, as have 29 forward-looking nations and several states in the US. They would not do that unless EMF was of serious concern.

Power line “M” runs in the same easement as 50 year old fuel pipelines to SeaTac. This easement goes thru dense residential developments. An accident when replacing the current H-poles with the proposed taller steel monopoles would be catastrophic. 

The average $/sqft home value in Newcastle is higher because people paid more for homes with views of the Cascades and Mt. Rainier. The proposed taller monopoles and wires will destroy these views for more homes, which will drive down the values of those homes and also affect the average $/sqft. Declining home values are the beginning of community decline.

Assuming that PSE’s demand forecast for this area is realistic and not driven by other motives, I request that the increased capacity be met with community-friendly solutions rather than the 230kV (and even higher voltage later) overhead line which will destroy the quality of life and property values of Newcastle residents.  

A. Roosme]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PSE’s proposal to replace the current 115kV overhead power line with 230kV lines on taller poles does not consider the negative impact on our community. Overhead power lines do not belong in residential areas for the following reasons:<br />
•	Exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) has been linked to increased rates<br />
        of certain cancers, such as leukemia in children and cancers of the lymph<br />
        and diseases of central nervous systems in adults<br />
•	Inhaling charged particles/pollutants around power lines has been linked to<br />
        an increase in free radicals and many adverse health effects, such as cancer<br />
•	Interference with implanted pacemakers and defibrillators<br />
•	Power line noise<br />
•	Aesthetics<br />
•	Impact on views<br />
•	All of the above contribute to significantly reduced residential property values</p>
<p>Overhead power line supporters say that studies of EMF on health have been inconclusive. Studies of tobacco smoke were also inconclusive for decades before undeniable links to cancers and other serious health conditions were identified.  The EPA and the EU have developed recommendations and regulations for limiting exposure to EMF, as have 29 forward-looking nations and several states in the US. They would not do that unless EMF was of serious concern.</p>
<p>Power line “M” runs in the same easement as 50 year old fuel pipelines to SeaTac. This easement goes thru dense residential developments. An accident when replacing the current H-poles with the proposed taller steel monopoles would be catastrophic. </p>
<p>The average $/sqft home value in Newcastle is higher because people paid more for homes with views of the Cascades and Mt. Rainier. The proposed taller monopoles and wires will destroy these views for more homes, which will drive down the values of those homes and also affect the average $/sqft. Declining home values are the beginning of community decline.</p>
<p>Assuming that PSE’s demand forecast for this area is realistic and not driven by other motives, I request that the increased capacity be met with community-friendly solutions rather than the 230kV (and even higher voltage later) overhead line which will destroy the quality of life and property values of Newcastle residents.  </p>
<p>A. Roosme</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>https://newcastle-news.com/2014/04/11/pse-to-answer-questions-about-energize-eastside/comment-page-1#comment-90812</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Administrator]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 23:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://newcastle-news.com/?p=11933#comment-90812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Curtis,

There is a link to the maps in the April 1 City Council roundup, linked in this article. For ease, here is a link to the PSE route map: http://www.energizeeastside.com/interactive-map.

For this particular segment, as PSE currently constitutes it, it&#039;s going to be Newcastle&#039;s Route M, or Route L.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curtis,</p>
<p>There is a link to the maps in the April 1 City Council roundup, linked in this article. For ease, here is a link to the PSE route map: <a href="http://www.energizeeastside.com/interactive-map" rel="nofollow">http://www.energizeeastside.com/interactive-map</a>.</p>
<p>For this particular segment, as PSE currently constitutes it, it&#8217;s going to be Newcastle&#8217;s Route M, or Route L.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curtis</title>
		<link>https://newcastle-news.com/2014/04/11/pse-to-answer-questions-about-energize-eastside/comment-page-1#comment-90808</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Curtis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 23:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://newcastle-news.com/?p=11933#comment-90808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Would be useful to see a map of the proposed routes in the article. Don&#039;t want to support or oppose an action with out understanding the alternatives.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would be useful to see a map of the proposed routes in the article. Don&#8217;t want to support or oppose an action with out understanding the alternatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
